Journey and friction audit
Trace the route from entry page to inquiry, checkout, or booking. Check what the visitor needs to understand and where the process asks too much.
CRO & Conversion Services
I review your pages, forms, and follow-up steps to understand where people get stuck. The recommendations focus on helping visitors understand the offer and complete the action they came for.
Sometimes the missing detail is a price explanation. Sometimes it’s an unclear button, a long form, or an inquiry nobody follows up on. I look at the full route from the first visit to the response.
I use page reviews, available analytics, and tools such as Clarity where suitable. I’ll explain the problems I find, recommend changes, and help prioritize what to test. Access, implementation, and data permissions are agreed at the start.
We’ll agree on the tasks, costs, and responsibilities before I start. These are the areas we can include.
Trace the route from entry page to inquiry, checkout, or booking. Check what the visitor needs to understand and where the process asks too much.
Confirm that meaningful actions and form outcomes are recorded. Separate a successful submission from an accidental click or failed attempt.
Prioritize clearer offers, evidence, content order, mobile behavior, and field requirements. Make implementation recommendations specific enough to act on.
Define hypotheses, success measures, constraints, and an appropriate review method. Do not force an A/B test onto traffic that cannot support it.
Define the business outcome and the audience expected to take it. Check the current event and submission data.
Review page content, mobile layouts, form behavior, and available user evidence. Use heatmaps or recordings as clues rather than proof on their own.
Fix broken interactions and obvious ambiguity before running sophisticated experiments. Separate accessibility repairs from speculative conversion ideas.
Check whether more completed actions also produce suitable customers. Document what was changed and what else may have affected the comparison.
I’ll look at the information you already have and agree with you on what to track. Here are some of the questions we can use it to answer.
Successful actions relative to relevant visits or starts.
The decision: Identify friction at a meaningful step.
Actions that meet the business acceptance criteria.
The decision: Avoid trading lead quality for easy form fills.
Errors, exits, and incomplete steps.
The decision: Fix the experience before increasing acquisition spend.
Technical reference: Microsoft Clarity heatmaps.
A few details about cro & conversion services.
A meaningful experiment depends on the baseline rate, expected change, traffic, and decision risk. Low-volume sites can still benefit from fixing errors, improving clarity, and using qualitative research. I would choose a review method that fits the available evidence instead of promising a statistically reliable result from a tiny sample.
Not by default. The starting point is the customer journey and its main constraints. A focused landing-page, message, or form change may be more useful than a broad redesign. Design and development responsibilities are agreed around the recommendations that actually need implementing.
It should mean more suitable people completing a meaningful action, not merely more clicks on a button. GA4 events and CRM feedback can help separate volume from quality. A shorter form that creates many irrelevant inquiries is not automatically an improvement for the business.
You may also want to look at these services, or learn about my approach and experience.
Conversion Optimization
Tell me what you need and what you’ve tried so far. I’ll read your message and reply by email.
Prefer email? hello@sanusiddharth.com